Watching people do things that I could only do in imagination is the lure of the Olympic Games. There is no doubt in the athletes’ abilities, but I have wondered whether some events are truly “sport”. One wary of labels and their confounds may fume over this thought. But the fabrics of sport and art are often weaved together, dampening their objectivity and certainty. Olympic disciplines like ice dance and rhythmic gymnastics need great strength and grace, though some will argue its status as a sport.

Athletes have long petitioned the inclusion of different sports in the Games. This will not change since tastes always will. The upcoming Olympics will feature five new sports, including surfing and skateboarding, which already parallel some sports established in the Winter Games. These are exciting additions, provoking me to wonder what else could be an Olympic Sport. Should there be more stringent criteria in sport inclusion, or should criteria be tempered by the popularity of a sport?

Or is the problem the notion of sport itself? There is a natural inclination to associate sport with athletic ability, though the International Olympic Committee has questionably ‘acknowledged’ certain events as sports. One that comes to mind is chess, which should just remain there as a sport. (Note that it is not an Olympic event, just ‘recognized’ as a sport) I do not dispute the intellectual prowess needed for chess success, but it is far removed from the physical power conventional to the Olympic Games.

Chess, along with other events and sports, already have international competitions in place, so why is there a need for Olympic eligibility? The Olympic status may be what all these disciplines vie for; the prestige of the Olympics, no matter how irrelevant to some, is an enduring soft pride and one many want to capture. Is this Olympic prestige exclusive to physical sports? And when does art interfere with the integrity of sport, if at all?

Probably whenever you lose medals over it.




2 thoughts on “is it a sport?

  1. The Olympics should be about physical sports, yet some sports are arts. Wrestling, Gymnastics, Ice figure skating, Judo are examples of sporting arts. I don’t believe soccer should be an Olympic sport that sport is in it’s onw category and they have the World Cup every four years.
    The Olympic committees are political and they make decisions of what sport is considered Olympic based on politics……

    Liked by 1 person

    1. I agree, the Olympics have always been political and I find soccer/football is redundant in the Olympics. Many other sports also have their own international events, but don’t have the popularity or prestige as the World Cup. Maybe political leverage could be gained by the inclusion of soccer, and maybe that’s why it’s there.

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s